Why Internal Antennas Are Better for Home Wifi

Illustration showing a football / soccer ball with the word "Internal" above it and a doughnut with the world "External" above it

Here, we explain the difference between internal and external Wi-Fi antennas and why internal antennas provide the best wireless coverage in the home, while external antennas provide a coverage area that resembles a doughnut.

All wireless equipment needs antennas to communicate. Some have visible, external antennas, others have internal antennas that we cannot see.

All routers and access points we sell at Eye Networks have internal antennas. See our wifi solutions here.

We constantly see articles and get questions based on the assumption that external antennas provide better coverage or higher transmission strength than internal antennas, regardless of scenario.

This is not true, but internal and external antennas have different strengths and weaknesses that make them suitable for different uses.

Let’s start at the beginning.

What do we mean by internal and external antennas?

Internal antennas are located inside the device and are usually not visible to the user.

For wireless clients — that is, mobile phones, computers, and other devices — internal antennas are completely dominant. For wireless equipment such as routers, modems, repeaters and IADs, there are still many vendors that use external wifi antennas.

Several types of external and internal antennas are in use, but for wireless products for the home, you will see these two almost exclusively:

  • Internal PIFA antennas, which are used in all wireless access points we resell. This is also the type of antenna used for most mobile phones.
    • P in PIFA stands for plan. IF stands for inverted F.
  • External dipole antennas, which are still found on a lot of routers and other devices that include wireless functionality.
    • “Dipole” means that it consists of two identical, conductive elements/poles.
The illustration shows simplified models of an inverted F antenna, which looks like an F lying down, and a dipole antenna, two interconnected poles.

With an external wifi antenna you get doughnut-shaped coverage

External dipole antennas can be controlled directionally. Thus, if the antennas are perfectly positioned, they can provide a stronger signal in a given direction. Directionally controlling signals works best outdoors where there are few obstacles to signals. Indoors, the obstacles are so many that Multipath technology (MIMO), which allows the signals to take multiple paths simultaneously to the client, usually will work better than directional control.

For Multipath minimizing the blind zone is also an advantage.

External dipole antennas have a blind zone of 60 degrees extending upwards and downwards, making the signal pattern of a typical dipole antenna look like a huge doughnut. This means that signal strength for floors above and/or below the antenna will be weaker.

The coverage area for external dipole antennas is doughnut shaped with a hole in the middle. The coverage area around a device surrounded by PIFA antennas is pretty much shaped like a sphere or a ball.

Internal Wi-Fi antennas get you Wi-Fi coverage (almost) shaped like a ball

Internal PIFA antennas provide a pattern that is more spherical and stretches in any direction. The pattern is influenced by how grounding has been done and the size of the circuit board in the unit – therefore it is not entirely sphere-shaped, but it will still distribute the signals much more evenly than the external antenna.

Internal PIFA antennas on a Zyxel WX3401.

In simple terms, an external antenna could provide coverage that extends farther away from the transmitter, while the internal antenna provides more complete coverage. The blind zone is minimized, also providing better conditions for Multipath technology.

Minimal Efficiency Differences

Basically, an external antenna has an efficiency of around 95, while the PIFA efficiency is around 75. In practice, the efficiency of internal and external antennas are still almost equal.

Because the antennas are literally external, they also need to be connected by cable, and the connection points and cable provide an efficiency loss that reduces the difference. Where the wires cross over electronic components, these will also add interference.

Wi-Fi device with external antennas attached with cables to the card.
Router with external antennas

The connectors on the circuit board may sometimes loosen because of rough handling, such as during transport, thereby causing unreliable contact and weaker effects.

External antennas have the best aerial gain

Antenna gain or gain is the ratio of how effective the antenna is, the direction it transmits in, and how effective an imaginary antenna with no signal loss would be.

Because antenna gain is a measure that combines efficiency with directional control, external antennas get the better results. However, this assumes that you are only looking at points that lie within the antenna’s doughnut-shaped coverage field, in the direction that the antenna is pointing.

In other words, internal antennas have slightly lower aerial gain, but they deliver signals with the same efficiency in a larger area.

No differences in transmission power on internal and external antennas

Here there is literally no difference. The transmission power of wireless equipment used in Norway is strictly regulated by law. Regardless of internal or external antennas, all equipment is subject to the same maximum limits. Attempting to amplify or “boost” the antenna, will in many cases take the transmission strength up to an illegal level. For more information on the rules and pitfalls when attempting to amplify your signals, see the article Don’t. Boost. Your Wi-Fi Signal.

Internal Antennas + Multipath = Best Indoors

For indoor home use, a combination of internal antennas and Multipath technology provides the most even coverage and the fewest blind zones, minimizing the risk of misaligned antennas.

So when is it better to use external antennas?

Direction control is the main strength of external antennas. They are therefore particularly well suited for outdoor use.

Article by Jan Pedro Tumusok and Jorunn Danielsen